DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Lincoln Continental vs 1999 AC Aceca Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

AC Aceca

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

80.75–81.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LincolnMakeAC
ContinentalModelAceca
1999Model year1999
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,1 s
215 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
279 HPPower326 HP
373 NmTorque427 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
76 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption15,1 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption10,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/60 R16Tyre size255/55 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5260 mmLength4660 mm
1870 mmWidth1890 mm
1420 mmHeight1340 mm
1745 KgWeight1615 Kg
2770 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Lincoln Continental and 1999 AC Aceca approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, AC Aceca leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…