DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Lexus GS vs 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Challenger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LexusMakeMitsubishi
GSModelChallenger
1997Model year1997
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

8,8 s0–100 km/h—
230 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2997 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
212 HPPower185 HP
275 NmTorque265 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank74 lt
17,5 ltUrban consumption16 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt
12,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears4
225/55 R16 94VTyre size265/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4965 mmLength4530 mm
1795 mmWidth1775 mm
1425 mmHeight1730 mm
1720 KgWeight1830 Kg
2780 mmWheelbase2725 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Lexus GS and 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Challenger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…