DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Landwind SUV vs 2006 Renault Trafic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Trafic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

61.5–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LandwindMakeRenault
SUVModelTrafic
2006Model year2006
SUVBody typeMinivan
5Seats9
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,6 s
140 km/hTop speed163 km/h
2800 ccEngine displacement2463 cc
92 HPPower135 HP
205 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
63 ltFuel tank90 lt
—Urban consumption10,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,7 lt
—Average consumption8,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
245/75 R16Tyre size195/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4800 mmLength4782 mm
1800 mmWidth1904 mm
1750 mmHeight1940 mm
1935 KgWeight1935 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase3098 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Landwind SUV and 2006 Renault Trafic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Trafic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…