DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Landwind SUV vs 2008 Opel Antara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Antara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LandwindMakeOpel
SUVModelAntara
2008Model year2008
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,9 s
140 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2351 ccEngine displacement2405 cc
126 HPPower150 HP
195 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank0 lt
—Urban consumption13,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,3 lt
—Average consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
245/75 R16Tyre size225/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4800 mmLength4575 mm
1800 mmWidth1850 mm
1750 mmHeight1704 mm
1885 KgWeight—
2760 mmWheelbase2707 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Landwind SUV and 2008 Opel Antara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Antara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…