DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Audi A4 vs 2003 Mazda Roadster Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Roadster

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

56.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeMazda
A4ModelRoadster
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeRoadster
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

12,6 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1595 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
102 HPPower125 HP
148 NmTorque142 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank48 lt
10,8 ltUrban consumption—
6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4548 mmLength3955 mm
1772 mmWidth1680 mm
1428 mmHeight1235 mm
1295 KgWeight1010 Kg
2650 mmWheelbase2265 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Audi A4 and 2003 Mazda Roadster approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Roadster leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…