DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs 2009 Audi TT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi TT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

86.75–87.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeAudi
Range Rover SportModelTT
2009Model year2009
SUVBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
5Doors2

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h5,9 s
209 km/hTop speed250 km/h
3628 ccEngine displacement3189 cc
272 HPPower250 HP
640 NmTorque320 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
84 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption14,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,8 lt
11,1 ltAverage consumption10,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—Tyre size245/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4783 mmLength4178 mm
—Width1842 mm
1784 mmHeight1352 mm
—Weight1410 Kg
2745 mmWheelbase2468 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport and 2009 Audi TT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi TT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…