DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2001 Mercury Mountaineer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Mountaineer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

73.5–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeMercury
Range RoverModelMountaineer
2001Model year2001
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h—
196 km/hTop speed180 km/h
4553 ccEngine displacement4942 cc
224 HPPower218 HP
380 NmTorque391 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank79 lt
22,9 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
16,4 ltExtra-urban consumption11,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
255/65 R16Tyre size225/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4713 mmLength4790 mm
1853 mmWidth1875 mm
1817 mmHeight1830 mm
2220 KgWeight1800 Kg
2745 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Land Rover Range Rover and 2001 Mercury Mountaineer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Mountaineer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…