DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2002 Ford Econoline Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Econoline

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

73.5–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeFord
Range RoverModelEconoline
2001Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
5Doors4

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h—
196 km/hTop speed160 km/h
4553 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
224 HPPower218 HP
380 NmTorque393 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank132 lt
22,9 ltUrban consumption16,8 lt
16,4 ltExtra-urban consumption12,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
255/65 R16Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4713 mmLength5382 mm
1853 mmWidth2014 mm
1817 mmHeight2050 mm
2220 KgWeight—
2745 mmWheelbase3505 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Land Rover Range Rover and 2002 Ford Econoline approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Econoline leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…