DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Land Rover Range Rover vs 1998 Holden Commodore Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Commodore

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

72.5–72.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeHolden
Range RoverModelCommodore
1998Model year1998
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h7,0 s
196 km/hTop speed240 km/h
4553 ccEngine displacement4981 cc
224 HPPower243 HP
380 NmTorque400 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank73 lt
22,9 ltUrban consumption—
16,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
255/65 R16Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4713 mmLength4885 mm
1853 mmWidth1840 mm
1817 mmHeight1450 mm
2220 KgWeight1600 Kg
2745 mmWheelbase2790 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Land Rover Range Rover and 1998 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Commodore leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…