DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Land Rover Range Rover vs 1990 AC Cobra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

AC Cobra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

72.5–72.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeAC
Range RoverModelCobra
1994Model year1990
Off-road vehicleBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h5,2 s
196 km/hTop speed215 km/h
4553 ccEngine displacement4942 cc
224 HPPower228 HP
380 NmTorque407 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank70 lt
22,9 ltUrban consumption17 lt
16,4 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
255/65 R16Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4713 mmLength4155 mm
1853 mmWidth1745 mm
1817 mmHeight1230 mm
2220 KgWeight1155 Kg
2745 mmWheelbase2285 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Land Rover Range Rover and 1990 AC Cobra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, AC Cobra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…