2017 • Land Rover
Range Rover
Land Rover Range Rover Range 4.4 V8 (339 Hp) 2017Overall Score88.75/100
2017 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2012 Lexus LS Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Lexus
LS
Lexus LS 2012Overall Score87.75/100
WINNER
Land Rover Range Rover
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
88.75–87.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Land Rover Range RoverSpecificationLexus LS
Land RoverMakeLexus
Range RoverModelLS
2017Model year2012
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Land Rover Range RoverSpecificationLexus LS
6,9 s0–100 km/h—
217 km/hTop speed210 km/h
4367 ccEngine displacement4608 cc
339 HPPower367 HP
600 NmTorque466 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Land Rover Range RoverSpecificationLexus LS
DieselFuel typePetrol
105 ltFuel tank84 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,7 ltAverage consumption10,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Land Rover Range RoverSpecificationLexus LS
4x4Drivetrain4x4
8Gears8
—Tyre size235/50 R18; 245/45 R19
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Land Rover Range RoverSpecificationLexus LS
4999 mmLength5060 mm
1983 mmWidth1875 mm
1835 mmHeight1465 mm
2360 KgWeight2145 Kg
2922 mmWheelbase2970 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Land Rover Range Rover and 2012 Lexus LS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Land Rover Range Rover leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…