DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2001 De Tomaso Mangusta Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

De Tomaso Mangusta

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

83.75–84.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeDe Tomaso
Range RoverModelMangusta
2002Model year2001
Off-road vehicleBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h—
208 km/hTop speed240 km/h
4398 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
286 HPPower305 HP
440 NmTorque406 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank80 lt
22,2 ltUrban consumption20 lt
12,6 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt
16,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
255/60 R18Tyre size255/40 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4950 mmLength4190 mm
1955 mmWidth1900 mm
1860 mmHeight1280 mm
2510 KgWeight1400 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Land Rover Range Rover and 2001 De Tomaso Mangusta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, De Tomaso Mangusta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…