DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Land Rover Range Rover vs 1996 Jeep Cherokee Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Cherokee

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

61.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeJeep
Range RoverModelCherokee
1994Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h10,1 s
180 km/hTop speed180 km/h
4273 ccEngine displacement3964 cc
202 HPPower178 HP
149 NmTorque301 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
82 ltFuel tank76 lt
21,6 ltUrban consumption22 lt
11,7 ltExtra-urban consumption12 lt
15,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears4
205/80 R16Tyre size225/70 R15 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4449 mmLength4240 mm
1818 mmWidth1790 mm
1790 mmHeight1625 mm
2075 KgWeight1635 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2576 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Land Rover Range Rover and 1996 Jeep Cherokee approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Cherokee leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…