DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2004 Jaguar XJR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XJR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

86.75–87.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeJaguar
Range RoverModelXJR
2007Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

8,0 s0–100 km/h5,3 s
225 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4196 ccEngine displacement4196 cc
390 HPPower395 HP
550 NmTorque541 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
105 ltFuel tank85 lt
22,4 ltUrban consumption17,9 lt
12,2 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt
—Average consumption12,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
255/50 R20Tyre size255/40 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4950 mmLength5024 mm
1955 mmWidth1799 mm
1860 mmHeight1314 mm
2560 KgWeight1728 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 Land Rover Range Rover and 2004 Jaguar XJR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XJR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…