DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2002 Porsche Cayenne Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Porsche Cayenne

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

86.75–87.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakePorsche
Range RoverModelCayenne
2005Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,0 s0–100 km/h5,6 s
225 km/hTop speed266 km/h
4196 ccEngine displacement4511 cc
390 HPPower450 HP
550 NmTorque620 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
105 ltFuel tank100 lt
22,4 ltUrban consumption21,9 lt
12,2 ltExtra-urban consumption11,9 lt
—Average consumption15,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
255/50 R20Tyre size255/55 R 18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4950 mmLength4782 mm
1955 mmWidth1928 mm
1860 mmHeight1699 mm
2560 KgWeight2430 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2855 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Land Rover Range Rover and 2002 Porsche Cayenne approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Porsche Cayenne leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…