DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2004 Jaguar XKR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XKR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

86.75–87.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeJaguar
Range RoverModelXKR
2005Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

8,0 s0–100 km/h5,4 s
225 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4196 ccEngine displacement4196 cc
390 HPPower395 HP
550 NmTorque541 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
105 ltFuel tank75 lt
22,4 ltUrban consumption18 lt
12,2 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
—Average consumption12,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
255/50 R20Tyre size245/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4950 mmLength4760 mm
1955 mmWidth2015 mm
1860 mmHeight1296 mm
2560 KgWeight1715 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2588 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Land Rover Range Rover and 2004 Jaguar XKR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XKR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…