DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2004 Jaguar S-type Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar S-type

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

86.75–87.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeJaguar
Range RoverModelS-type
2005Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

8,0 s0–100 km/h5,6 s
225 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4196 ccEngine displacement4196 cc
390 HPPower395 HP
550 NmTorque541 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
105 ltFuel tank68 lt
22,4 ltUrban consumption18,5 lt
12,2 ltExtra-urban consumption9,6 lt
—Average consumption12,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
255/50 R20Tyre size245/40 R18; 275/35 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4950 mmLength4861 mm
1955 mmWidth1819 mm
1860 mmHeight1441 mm
2560 KgWeight1800 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2909 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Land Rover Range Rover and 2004 Jaguar S-type approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar S-type leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…