DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2000 Toyota Mega Cruiser Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Mega Cruiser

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeToyota
Range RoverModelMega Cruiser
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats6
5Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3947 ccEngine displacement4104 cc
185 HPPower155 HP
340 NmTorque390 Nm
8Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
100 ltFuel tank108 lt
22,5 ltUrban consumption—
12,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears4
235/70R16Tyre size37/12,5 R17.5
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4713 mmLength5090 mm
1853 mmWidth2170 mm
1853 mmHeight2075 mm
2120 KgWeight2850 Kg
2745 mmWheelbase3395 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Land Rover Range Rover and 2000 Toyota Mega Cruiser approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Mega Cruiser leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…