DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2000 Jeep Cherokee Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Cherokee

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeJeep
Range RoverModelCherokee
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3947 ccEngine displacement3956 cc
185 HPPower192 HP
340 NmTorque318 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank76 lt
22,5 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
12,6 ltExtra-urban consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/70R16Tyre size225/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4713 mmLength4254 mm
1853 mmWidth1763 mm
1853 mmHeight1624 mm
2120 KgWeight1475 Kg
2745 mmWheelbase2576 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Land Rover Range Rover and 2000 Jeep Cherokee approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Cherokee leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…