DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Land Rover Range Rover vs 1994 Buick Regal Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Buick Regal

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

69.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeBuick
Range RoverModelRegal
1994Model year1994
Off-road vehicleBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors2

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h—
179 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3947 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
182 HPPower208 HP
312 NmTorque312 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
82 ltFuel tank64 lt
—Urban consumption12,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,1 lt
14,2 ltAverage consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4 Hydramatic
205/80 R16Tyre size205/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4449 mmLength4925 mm
1818 mmWidth1842 mm
1790 mmHeight1354 mm
1892 KgWeight1491 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Land Rover Range Rover and 1994 Buick Regal approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Buick Regal leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…