1999 • Land Rover
Range Rover
Land Rover Range Rover Range 3.9 V8 (190 Hp) 1999Overall Score63.5/100
1999 Land Rover Range Rover vs 1999 Ford Mustang Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Ford
Mustang
Ford Mustang 3.8 V6 GT (152 Hp) 1999Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Ford Mustang
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
63.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Land Rover Range RoverSpecificationFord Mustang
Land RoverMakeFord
Range RoverModelMustang
1999Model year1999
Off-road vehicleBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2+2
5Doors2
Performance
Land Rover Range RoverSpecificationFord Mustang
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3900 ccEngine displacement3797 cc
190 HPPower152 HP
0 NmTorque291 Nm
8Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Land Rover Range RoverSpecificationFord Mustang
—DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Land Rover Range RoverSpecificationFord Mustang
—Length4610 mm
—Width1820 mm
—Height1360 mm
—Weight1455 Kg
—Wheelbase2570 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Land Rover Range Rover and 1999 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSHolden Caprice vs Land Rover Range Rover1999 and 1999 model years
VSHolden Commodore vs Land Rover Range Rover1999 and 1999 model years
VSBuick Regal vs Land Rover Range Rover1999 and 1999 model years
VSFord Explorer vs Land Rover Range Rover1999 and 1999 model years
VSLand Rover Range Rover vs Land Rover Range Rover2000 and 1999 model yearsComments are loading…