DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2000 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Range Rover

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

63.5–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeFord
Range RoverModelExplorer
1999Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,7 s
0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
3900 ccEngine displacement3958 cc
190 HPPower162 HP
0 NmTorque305 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank83 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4790 mm
—Width1790 mm
—Height1800 mm
—Weight1990 Kg
—Wheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Land Rover Range Rover and 2000 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Range Rover leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…