DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Audi A4 vs 2016 Citroen C3-XR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C3-XR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

75.5–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeCitroen
A4ModelC3-XR
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

8,7 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed209 km/h
1395 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
150 HPPower167 HP
250 NmTorque245 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
54 ltFuel tank53 lt
6,7 ltUrban consumption—
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,2 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears4
205/60 R16; 225/50 R17; 245/40 R18; 245/35 R19Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4726 mmLength4262 mm
1842 mmWidth1748 mm
1427 mmHeight1557 mm
1320 KgWeight1270 Kg
2820 mmWheelbase2655 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Audi A4 and 2016 Citroen C3-XR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C3-XR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…