DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Land Rover Range Rover vs 1996 Holden Calais Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Calais

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

63.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeHolden
Range RoverModelCalais
1996Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,0 s
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
3900 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
190 HPPower175 HP
0 NmTorque295 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Average consumption12,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears4
—Tyre size205/65 R15 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4861 mm
—Width1794 mm
—Height1443 mm
—Weight1454 Kg
—Wheelbase2736 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Land Rover Range Rover and 1996 Holden Calais approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Calais leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…