DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Land Rover Range Rover vs 1995 MG MGR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG MGR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

66.5–66.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeMG
Range RoverModelMGR
1994Model year1995
Off-road vehicleBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2+2
4Doors2

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h6,0 s
179 km/hTop speed217 km/h
3947 ccEngine displacement3947 cc
188 HPPower190 HP
319 NmTorque318 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
82 ltFuel tank51 lt
18,2 ltUrban consumption14 lt
10,5 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
13,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain—
5Gears5
205/80 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4449 mmLength4010 mm
1818 mmWidth1690 mm
1790 mmHeight1320 mm
1980 KgWeight1100 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2330 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Land Rover Range Rover and 1995 MG MGR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG MGR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…