DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Land Rover Range Rover vs 1995 Jeep Cherokee Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Cherokee

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

66.5–66.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeJeep
Range RoverModelCherokee
1994Model year1995
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h—
179 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3947 ccEngine displacement3960 cc
188 HPPower190 HP
319 NmTorque305 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
82 ltFuel tank76 lt
18,2 ltUrban consumption—
10,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
13,4 ltAverage consumption13,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/80 R16Tyre size225/75 R15 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4449 mmLength4288 mm
1818 mmWidth1720 mm
1790 mmHeight1622 mm
1980 KgWeight1381 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2575 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Land Rover Range Rover and 1995 Jeep Cherokee approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Cherokee leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…