DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2005 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi A3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

86.75–87.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeAudi
Range RoverModelA3
2007Model year2005
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h6,5 s
200 km/hTop speed250 km/h
3628 ccEngine displacement3189 cc
272 HPPower250 HP
640 NmTorque320 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
105 ltFuel tank60 lt
14,4 ltUrban consumption14,8 lt
9,2 ltExtra-urban consumption8,2 lt
11,3 ltAverage consumption10,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
255/60 R18Tyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4972 mmLength4203 mm
1956 mmWidth1765 mm
1902 mmHeight1421 mm
2635 KgWeight1495 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2578 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 Land Rover Range Rover and 2005 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi A3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…