DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2014 Lotus Evora Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Range Rover

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

88.75–88.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeLotus
Range RoverModelEvora
2017Model year2014
SUVBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

7,9 s0–100 km/h4,9 s
209 km/hTop speed261 km/h
2993 ccEngine displacement3456 cc
258 HPPower280 HP
600 NmTorque342 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
7,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
8Gears6
—Tyre size225/40 R18; 255/35 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4999 mmLength4350 mm
1983 mmWidth1848 mm
1835 mmHeight1229 mm
2160 KgWeight1382 Kg
2922 mmWheelbase2575 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Land Rover Range Rover and 2014 Lotus Evora approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Range Rover leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…