DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2010 Cadillac BLS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Cadillac BLS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

86.75–87.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeCadillac
Range RoverModelBLS
2012Model year2010
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

7,9 s0–100 km/h6,9 s
209 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2993 ccEngine displacement2792 cc
258 HPPower255 HP
600 NmTorque365 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank58 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption15,4 lt
7,0 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption10,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
8Gears6
—Tyre size235/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4999 mmLength4680 mm
1983 mmWidth1752 mm
1835 mmHeight1471 mm
2160 KgWeight—
2922 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Land Rover Range Rover and 2010 Cadillac BLS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Cadillac BLS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…