DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2012 Porsche Cayman Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Porsche Cayman

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

86.75–87.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakePorsche
Range RoverModelCayman
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

7,9 s0–100 km/h5,4 s
209 km/hTop speed275 km/h
2993 ccEngine displacement3387 cc
258 HPPower295 HP
600 NmTorque350 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank64 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption15,3 lt
7,0 ltExtra-urban consumption7,8 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
8Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4999 mmLength4341 mm
1983 mmWidth1801 mm
1835 mmHeight1305 mm
2160 KgWeight1340 Kg
2922 mmWheelbase2415 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Land Rover Range Rover and 2012 Porsche Cayman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Porsche Cayman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…