DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2016 Volvo V70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

86.75–87.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeVolvo
Range RoverModelV70
2014Model year2016
SUVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

6,9 s0–100 km/h6,6 s
218 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2993 ccEngine displacement2953 cc
292 HPPower304 HP
600 NmTorque440 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Hybrid – Diesel / ElectricFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
6,7 ltUrban consumption—
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,4 ltAverage consumption10,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—Drivetrain4x4
—Gears6
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4999 mmLength4814 mm
1983 mmWidth1907 mm
1835 mmHeight1547 mm
2394 KgWeight—
2922 mmWheelbase2816 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Land Rover Range Rover and 2016 Volvo V70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…