DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2005 Ford Taurus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Taurus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

70.5–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeFord
Range RoverModelTaurus
2005Model year2005
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

13,6 s0–100 km/h—
179 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2926 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
177 HPPower201 HP
390 NmTorque271 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank68 lt
14,4 ltUrban consumption—
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
255/55 R19Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4950 mmLength5019 mm
1955 mmWidth1854 mm
1860 mmHeight1425 mm
2500 KgWeight1503 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2756 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Land Rover Range Rover and 2005 Ford Taurus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…