DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2004 Peugeot 406 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Peugeot 406

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

67.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakePeugeot
Range RoverModel406
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

13,6 s0–100 km/h8,1 s
179 km/hTop speed240 km/h
2926 ccEngine displacement2946 cc
177 HPPower207 HP
390 NmTorque285 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank70 lt
14,4 ltUrban consumption13,7 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
11,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
255/55 R19Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4950 mmLength4598 mm
1955 mmWidth1765 mm
1860 mmHeight1404 mm
2500 KgWeight1455 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Land Rover Range Rover and 2004 Peugeot 406 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Peugeot 406 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…