DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Eclipse

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

67.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeMitsubishi
Range RoverModelEclipse
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2+2
5Doors2

Performance

13,6 s0–100 km/h7,6 s
179 km/hTop speed215 km/h
2926 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
177 HPPower203 HP
390 NmTorque278 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank62 lt
14,4 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt
11,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
255/55 R19Tyre size215/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4950 mmLength4455 mm
1955 mmWidth1750 mm
1860 mmHeight1341 mm
2500 KgWeight1540 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2560 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Land Rover Range Rover and 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Eclipse leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…