DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Land Rover Range Rover vs 1998 Saab 9000 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9000

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

61.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeSaab
Range RoverModel9000
1998Model year1998
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

14,3 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
185 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2290 cc
136 HPPower147 HP
270 NmTorque205 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank66 lt
12,8 ltUrban consumption—
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,6 ltAverage consumption9,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/70 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4713 mmLength4761 mm
1853 mmWidth1778 mm
1817 mmHeight1420 mm
2115 KgWeight1360 Kg
2745 mmWheelbase2672 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Land Rover Range Rover and 1998 Saab 9000 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9000 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…