DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Land Rover Range Rover vs 1995 Ford Taurus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Taurus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

61.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeFord
Range RoverModelTaurus
1995Model year1995
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

14,3 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2986 cc
136 HPPower141 HP
270 NmTorque217 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank61 lt
12,8 ltUrban consumption—
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
235/70 R16Tyre size205/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4713 mmLength4877 mm
1853 mmWidth1808 mm
1817 mmHeight1374 mm
2115 KgWeight1414 Kg
2745 mmWheelbase2692 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Land Rover Range Rover and 1995 Ford Taurus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…