DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Land Rover Range Rover vs 1994 Mitsubishi Chariot Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Chariot

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

61.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeMitsubishi
Range RoverModelChariot
1994Model year1994
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors4

Performance

14,3 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2351 cc
136 HPPower145 HP
270 NmTorque206 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,8 ltUrban consumption—
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,6 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
235/70 R16Tyre size205/65 R14 H
YesABS—

Dimensions

4713 mmLength4515 mm
1853 mmWidth1695 mm
1817 mmHeight1580 mm
2115 KgWeight1370 Kg
2745 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Land Rover Range Rover and 1994 Mitsubishi Chariot approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Chariot leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…