DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs 2012 KTM X-Bow Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

KTM X-Bow

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

78.75–79.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeKTM
Range Rover EvoqueModelX-Bow
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeRoadster
5Seats2
5Doors—

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h3,9 s
200 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2179 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
190 HPPower240 HP
420 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank40 lt
6,7 ltUrban consumption—
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,7 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size205/40 R17; 235/40 R18
YesABS—

Dimensions

4355 mmLength3738 mm
1965 mmWidth1915 mm
1635 mmHeight1202 mm
1700 KgWeight790 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2430 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and 2012 KTM X-Bow approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, KTM X-Bow leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…