DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs 2016 Volkswagen Scirocco Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Scirocco

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

72.5–72.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeVolkswagen
Range Rover EvoqueModelScirocco
2016Model year2016
SUV, CrossoverBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h8,6 s
182 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
380 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
54 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption5,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,8 lt
4,3 ltAverage consumption4,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size205/50 R17; 225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4371 mmLength4256 mm
1985 mmWidth1810 mm
1660 mmHeight1406 mm
1608 KgWeight1375 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2578 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and 2016 Volkswagen Scirocco approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Scirocco leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…