2020 • Land Rover
Range Rover
Land Rover Range Rover Autobiography 2020 2.0 404 HPOverall Score90.25/100
2020 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2018 Rolls-Royce Cullinan Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2018 • Rolls-Royce
Cullinan
Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12 (571 Hp) 2018Overall Score92.5/100
WINNER
Rolls-Royce Cullinan
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 2.25 points.
90.25–92.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Land Rover Range RoverSpecificationRolls-Royce Cullinan
Land RoverMakeRolls-Royce
Range RoverModelCullinan
2020Model year2018
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Land Rover Range RoverSpecificationRolls-Royce Cullinan
6,8 s0–100 km/h5,2 s
220 km/hTop speed250 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement6749 cc
404 HPPower571 HP
640 NmTorque850 Nm
6Cylinders12
Fuel & Consumption
Land Rover Range RoverSpecificationRolls-Royce Cullinan
Petrol & ElectricFuel typePetrol
90 ltFuel tank0 lt
3,5 ltUrban consumption21,9 lt
3,1 ltExtra-urban consumption10,9 lt
3,3 ltAverage consumption15,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Land Rover Range RoverSpecificationRolls-Royce Cullinan
4x4Drivetrain4x4
8Gears8
AutomaticTransmission—
19Tyre size—
NoABSYes
Dimensions
Land Rover Range RoverSpecificationRolls-Royce Cullinan
5000 mmLength5341 mm
2073 mmWidth2000 mm
1869 mmHeight1835 mm
2509 kgWeight2660 Kg
550 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase3295 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2020 Land Rover Range Rover and 2018 Rolls-Royce Cullinan approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rolls-Royce Cullinan leads the E-Kıyasla score by 2.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
Comments are loading…