DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Land Rover Freelander vs 2005 Suzuki Verona Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Verona

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

68.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeSuzuki
FreelanderModelVerona
2005Model year2005
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

11,1 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
182 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2492 cc
177 HPPower156 HP
240 NmTorque240 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank65 lt
17,2 ltUrban consumption12,3 lt
9,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
—Average consumption8,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
215/65 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4433 mmLength4770 mm
1809 mmWidth1815 mm
1709 mmHeight1440 mm
1550 KgWeight1535 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Land Rover Freelander and 2005 Suzuki Verona approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Verona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…