DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Land Rover Freelander vs 2005 Nissan Frontier Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Frontier

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

68.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeNissan
FreelanderModelFrontier
2005Model year2005
Off-road vehicleBody typePick-up
5Seats5
3Doors2

Performance

11,1 s0–100 km/h—
182 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
177 HPPower154 HP
240 NmTorque231 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank80 lt
17,2 ltUrban consumption12,3 lt
9,7 ltExtra-urban consumption10,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size235/75 R15; 265/70 R16; 265/75 R16; 265/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4433 mmLength5220 mm
1809 mmWidth1850 mm
1709 mmHeight1879 mm
1550 KgWeight—
2557 mmWheelbase3200 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Land Rover Freelander and 2005 Nissan Frontier approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Frontier leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…