DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Land Rover Freelander vs 2004 Nissan Pathfinder Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Pathfinder

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeNissan
FreelanderModelPathfinder
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats7
3Doors4

Performance

11,1 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
182 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
177 HPPower174 HP
240 NmTorque403 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank80 lt
17,2 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
9,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
—Average consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
4Gears6
215/65 R16Tyre size255/65 R17
YesABS—

Dimensions

4433 mmLength4877 mm
1809 mmWidth1854 mm
1709 mmHeight1879 mm
1550 KgWeight2132 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2853 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Land Rover Freelander and 2004 Nissan Pathfinder approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Pathfinder leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…