DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Land Rover Freelander vs 2004 Hyundai XG Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Hyundai XG

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeHyundai
FreelanderModelXG
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

11,1 s0–100 km/h9,1 s
182 km/hTop speed213 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2494 cc
177 HPPower163 HP
240 NmTorque230 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
17,2 ltUrban consumption14,0 lt
9,7 ltExtra-urban consumption9,0 lt
—Average consumption10,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4433 mmLength4865 mm
1809 mmWidth1825 mm
1709 mmHeight1420 mm
1550 KgWeight1640 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Land Rover Freelander and 2004 Hyundai XG approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Hyundai XG leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…