DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Land Rover Freelander vs 2002 Acura RSX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Acura RSX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeAcura
FreelanderModelRSX
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
3Doors2

Performance

11,1 s0–100 km/h6,7 s
182 km/hTop speed214 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
177 HPPower203 HP
240 NmTorque192 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
17,2 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
9,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
215/65 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4433 mmLength4374 mm
1809 mmWidth1725 mm
1709 mmHeight1400 mm
1550 KgWeight1280 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2570 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Land Rover Freelander and 2002 Acura RSX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Acura RSX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…