DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Land Rover Freelander vs 2000 Volvo C70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo C70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeVolvo
FreelanderModelC70
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
3Doors2

Performance

11,1 s0–100 km/h8,9 s
182 km/hTop speed215 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2435 cc
177 HPPower170 HP
240 NmTorque220 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
17,2 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
9,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size225/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4433 mmLength4720 mm
1809 mmWidth1820 mm
1709 mmHeight1410 mm
1550 KgWeight1560 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Land Rover Freelander and 2000 Volvo C70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo C70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…