DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Land Rover Freelander vs 2000 Saab 9-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeSaab
FreelanderModel9-5
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

11,1 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
182 km/hTop speed225 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2290 cc
177 HPPower170 HP
240 NmTorque280 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank75 lt
17,2 ltUrban consumption13,9 lt
9,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size205/65 R15; 215/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4433 mmLength4805 mm
1809 mmWidth1792 mm
1709 mmHeight1449 mm
1550 KgWeight1510 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2703 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Land Rover Freelander and 2000 Saab 9-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…