DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Land Rover Freelander vs 2013 Chevrolet Captiva Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Captiva

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 2 points.

73.5–75.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeChevrolet
FreelanderModelCaptiva
2009Model year2013
Off-road vehicleBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,7 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
181 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2179 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
160 HPPower163 HP
400 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank65 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption9,9 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x2
6Gears6
—TransmissionAutomatic
215/75 R16Tyre size17
YesABSNo

Dimensions

4500 mmLength4679 mm
1910 mmWidth1868 mm
1740 mmHeight1756 mm
1770 KgWeight1903 kg
—Luggage capacity447 lt
2660 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Land Rover Freelander and 2013 Chevrolet Captiva approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Captiva leads the E-Kıyasla score by 2 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…