DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Land Rover Freelander vs 2008 Ford Galaxy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Galaxy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeFord
FreelanderModelGalaxy
2008Model year2008
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

11,7 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
181 km/hTop speed208 km/h
2179 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
160 HPPower175 HP
400 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/75 R16Tyre size215/60R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4500 mmLength4820 mm
1910 mmWidth1854 mm
1740 mmHeight1723 mm
1770 KgWeight1735 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Land Rover Freelander and 2008 Ford Galaxy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Galaxy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…