DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Land Rover Freelander vs 2013 Volvo V60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

76.5–76.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeVolvo
FreelanderModelV60
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h6,1 s
190 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2179 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
190 HPPower215 HP
420 NmTorque640 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeHybrid – Diesel / Electric
68 ltFuel tank45 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption—
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,0 ltAverage consumption1,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain—
6Gears—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4500 mmLength4635 mm
—Width1899 mm
1740 mmHeight1484 mm
1805 KgWeight2058 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2776 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Land Rover Freelander and 2013 Volvo V60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…